| ccc {yardstick} | R Documentation |
Calculate the concordance correlation coefficient.
ccc(data, ...) ## S3 method for class 'data.frame' ccc(data, truth, estimate, bias = FALSE, na_rm = TRUE, ...) ccc_vec(truth, estimate, bias = FALSE, na_rm = TRUE, ...)
data |
A |
... |
Not currently used. |
truth |
The column identifier for the true results
(that is |
estimate |
The column identifier for the predicted
results (that is also |
bias |
A |
na_rm |
A |
ccc() is a metric of both consistency/correlation and accuracy,
while metrics such as rmse() are strictly for accuracy and metrics
such as rsq() are strictly for consistency/correlation
A tibble with columns .metric, .estimator,
and .estimate and 1 row of values.
For grouped data frames, the number of rows returned will be the same as the number of groups.
For ccc_vec(), a single numeric value (or NA).
Max Kuhn
Lin, L. (1989). A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics, 45 (1), 255-268.
Nickerson, C. (1997). A note on "A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility". Biometrics, 53(4), 1503-1507.
Other numeric metrics:
huber_loss_pseudo(),
huber_loss(),
iic(),
mae(),
mape(),
mase(),
mpe(),
msd(),
rmse(),
rpd(),
rpiq(),
rsq_trad(),
rsq(),
smape()
Other consistency metrics:
rpd(),
rpiq(),
rsq_trad(),
rsq()
Other accuracy metrics:
huber_loss_pseudo(),
huber_loss(),
iic(),
mae(),
mape(),
mase(),
mpe(),
msd(),
rmse(),
smape()
# Supply truth and predictions as bare column names
ccc(solubility_test, solubility, prediction)
library(dplyr)
set.seed(1234)
size <- 100
times <- 10
# create 10 resamples
solubility_resampled <- bind_rows(
replicate(
n = times,
expr = sample_n(solubility_test, size, replace = TRUE),
simplify = FALSE
),
.id = "resample"
)
# Compute the metric by group
metric_results <- solubility_resampled %>%
group_by(resample) %>%
ccc(solubility, prediction)
metric_results
# Resampled mean estimate
metric_results %>%
summarise(avg_estimate = mean(.estimate))