R: GOF Testing Transformation of Hering and Hofert

htrafo {copula} | R Documentation

## GOF Testing Transformation of Hering and Hofert

### Description

The transformation described in Hering and Hofert (2014), for Archimedean copulas.

### Usage

    htrafo(u, copula, include.K = TRUE, n.MC = 0, inverse = FALSE,
           method = eval(formals(qK)$method), u.grid, ...)

### Arguments

`u` | n x d-matrix with values in [0,1]. If `inverse=FALSE` (the default), `u` contains (pseudo-/copula-)observations from the copula `copula` based on which the transformation is carried out; consider applying the function `pobs()` first in order to obtain `u`. If `inverse=TRUE`, `u` contains U[0,1]^d distributed values which are transformed to copula-based (`copula`) ones.
`copula` | an Archimedean copula specified as `"outer_nacopula"` or `"archmCopula"`.
`include.K` | logical indicating whether the last component, involving the Kendall distribution function `K`, is used in `htrafo()`.
`n.MC` | parameter `n.MC` for `K`.
`inverse` | logical indicating whether the inverse of the transformation is returned.
`method` | method to compute `qK()`.
`u.grid` | argument of `qK()` (for `method="discrete"`).
`...` | additional arguments passed to `qK()` if `inverse = TRUE`.

### Details

Given a d-dimensional random vector U following an Archimedean copula C with generator ψ, Hering and Hofert (2014) showed that U'~U[0,1]^d, where

U'_j = ((psi^{-1}(U_1) + ... + psi^{-1}(U_j)) / (psi^{-1}(U_1) + ... + psi^{-1}(U_{j+1})))^j, j in {1,..., d-1}, U'_d = K(C(U)).

`htrafo` applies this transformation row-wise to `u` and thus returns either an n x d- or an n x (d-1)-matrix, depending on whether the last component U'_d which involves the (possibly numerically challenging) Kendall distribution function K is used (`include.K=TRUE`) or not (`include.K=FALSE`).

### Value

`htrafo()` returns an n x d- or n x (d-1)-matrix (depending on whether `include.K` is `TRUE` or `FALSE`) containing the transformed input `u`.

### References

Hering, C. and Hofert, M. (2014). Goodness-of-fit tests for Archimedean copulas in high dimensions. Innovations in Quantitative Risk Management.

### Examples

    ## Sample and build pseudo-observations (what we normally have available)
    ## of a Clayton copula
    tau <- 0.5
    theta <- iTau(claytonCopula(), tau = tau)
    d <- 5
    cc <- claytonCopula(theta, dim = d)
    set.seed(271)
    n <- 1000
    U <- rCopula(n, copula = cc)
    X <- qnorm(U) # X now follows a meta-Gumbel model with N(0,1) marginals
    U <- pobs(X) # build pseudo-observations

    ## Graphically check if the data comes from a meta-Clayton model
    ## with the transformation of Hering and Hofert (2014):
    U.H <- htrafo(U, copula = cc) # transform the data
    splom2(U.H, cex = 0.2) # looks good

    ## The same for an 'outer_nacopula' object
    cc. <- onacopulaL("Clayton", list(theta, 1:d))
    U.H. <- htrafo(U, copula = cc.)
    splom2(U.H., cex = 0.2) # looks good

    ## What about a meta-Gumbel model?
    ## The parameter is chosen such that Kendall's tau equals (the same) tau
    gc <- gumbelCopula(iTau(gumbelCopula(), tau = tau), dim = d)

    ## Plot of the transformed data (Hering and Hofert (2014)) to see the
    ## deviations from uniformity
    U.H.. <- htrafo(U, copula = gc)
    splom2(U.H.., cex = 0.2) # deviations visible

[Package copula version 1.0-1 Index]